Especially since radiation is a major side effect of such a weapon. The fact that the enemy is ready to die so long as you die with him is not something a soldier wants to think about before going into battle.
Or the one that does hold together but offends our self concept? Fleet Admiral Chester W. Once the bomb was proven to work on July 15,events took on a furious urgency.
The Japanese surrendered on August 14,eight days after the first bomb was dropped. There was simply no time to work through negotiations with the Japanese. The decision to use the atomic bomb was validated by the U.
This issue of territory in east Asia was especially important because before the war against Japan, China had been embroiled in a civil war of its own. There was no risk to U.
Why wouldn"t they use guns or other weapons? The Japanese surrendered six days after the bombing of Nagasaki, and the war was finally over. But there is simply no factual basis for this in any record of the time.
Leahy, Chief of Staff to President Truman, said the same thing: American President Harry S. The Atomic Bomb cut losses to a minimum and drew war to an end quickly. Had they considered all of the alternatives, and had only used the atomic bomb as a last resort, many lives could have been saved.
The proclamation demanded "the unconditional surrender of all the Japanese armed forces. First, we must look at what was going on at the time the decision was made.
The moral issue of dropping an atomic bomb is very controversial. Might the war have ended as soon, with less deaths on both sides, and before the Soviets had entered into northern Korea?
It shouldn"t matter what kind of warning is given, a threat under such conditions should be taken seriously, and the citizens should have evacuated.
The scary thing about this is the majority of the Japanese military thought this way. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us.
The Japanese were counting on Russia to help them make peace with the U. One could wonder if the motive behind this second attack was similar to the first; the only difference being that the bomb to be tested this time was considerably more powerful.
While it cannot be proven, officially allies of the U. Yet the question will not die, nor should it: There is no way we can know for certain whether another approach would have ended the Pacific war sooner and with fewer deaths. These are the kinds of things that happen in war, however unfortunate they are.
There was a chance the Japanese people would have enlisted the Emperor to bring Japan to surrender by late July or early August of The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender. Now, I"m going to be honest, I don"t believe that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the best places to bomb, due to the high civilian numbers; however, it is still my belief that the Atomic Bomb was necessary to end the war.
But we may regret that such an attempt was not made. On that fateful day, a nuclear weapon was used against human beings for the first time. For all anyone knows, Japan would have kept fighting.
By the end of the war, the U. As the war with Germany grew closer to the end, the United States had their hands full with an increasingly effective war with Japan. The knowledge that the Soviets were about to declare war on Japan would have crushed any hope the Japanese had of negotiating peace terms through the Soviets.Free atomic bomb papers, essays, and research papers.
My Account. Your search returned over - Part A – Plan of Investigation This investigation focuses on the use and necessity of the atomic bomb in World War II. To what extent did the atomic bomb dropped by the United States during World War II save lives.
History Atomic Bomb. Was The Atomic Bomb Necessary History Essay. Print Reference this. Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional academic writers.
Post atomic bomb prediction estimates have claimed the possibility of up to a million casualties in the a U.S invasion of Japan. The first.
Discuss the different perspectives on the U.S. decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. Evaluate the moral implications of the decision. geography, and current events, write a well-organized essay in which you: Discuss the different perspectives on the U.S.
decision to drop the atomic bomb on. The dictionary definition defines the atomic bomb as a very destructive bomb utilizing the energy released by splitting an atom. This concept of this bomb does not seem to difficult to master, but actually the atom bomb was probably one of the most difficult creations of the 20th century.
The free world war ii research paper (Atomic Bomb: Was it necessary essay) presented on this page should not be viewed as a sample of our on-line writing service. If you need fresh and competent research / writing on world war ii, use the professional writing service offered by our company.
The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki History Essay. Print and has become a vocal proponent of nuclear disarmament (Military History, ). “The reason that I hate the atomic bomb is because of what it does to the dignity of human beings,” Yamaguchi explained to The Times.
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer.Download